Economic Theory Related to Environmental Damages and Externalities
Market Failure and Negative Externalities
When environmental damages—local or global—are not properly regulated or priced, markets fail by overusing environmental resources. Negative externalities arise when the costs imposed on third parties are not reflected in the transactions between buyers and sellers. As a result, producers exceed the socially optimal output level, and the overall societal cost is higher than what would be incurred if preventive measures were taken at the source (e.g., at the factory's gate or chimney).
Practical Examples of Environmental Damages and Externalities
Environmental damages often arise when firms release pollutants into the environment without bearing the full cost of the resulting harm. For example, a pulp mill's discharge of pollutants into a river can reduce downstream fish populations, thereby adversely affecting communities or industries dependent on these fisheries. This situation represents a local public good problem, as these downstream communities have limited means to charge upstream polluters for their diminished fisheries-related benefits.
In such cases, pollution becomes excessive due to the presence of an environmental externality: the pulp mill is not required to pay for the negative impacts of its pollutants and thus continues to overuse an unpriced environmental resource.
A different type of environmental cost occurs when a cement mill emits CO2 into the atmosphere, impairing a global public good—the global atmospheric capacity to absorb greenhouse gases. This too constitutes an externality if the carbon emissions are not adequately priced or limited through policy measures such as emission taxes or tradable quotas aligned with the social cost of carbon (SCC).
Formally, an externality is defined as a cost (or benefit) of an economic activity that is incurred by an unrelated third party. Put simply, it can be understood as a societal cost not captured in market transactions.
When environmental damages are neither regulated nor taxed, managers and owners of corporations lack sufficient incentives to account for these harms in their decision-making. By contrast, if regulations, such as tradable emission quotas or emission taxes, are implemented, decision-makers can more effectively integrate environmental concerns into their strategic considerations—much as they currently account for financial performance.
Market-Based Policy Instruments and Efficiency
When market-based policy instruments, such as tradable permits or emission taxes, are employed to regulate environmental damages, the avoidance of pollution becomes more cost-effective. For instance, within the European Union's Emissions Trading System, the price of CO2 quotas signals to cement mills the value society places on reducing emissions. Firms capable of reducing emissions at lower costs will do so more extensively, even if they already hold sufficient permits.
Consequently, these additional compliance costs factor into the price of cement, sending a clear market signal to consumers about the societal importance of reducing cement consumption. This may encourage them to substitute other materials (e.g., wood or steel) for cement beams.
From a societal perspective, a negative externality leads to a suboptimal allocation of resources because it drives a wedge between social and private costs. For example, a pulp and paper mill's CO2 emissions harm the broader society, even though the mill's economic benefits mostly accrue to its owners. While society also benefits from accessible paper products, these goods are overconsumed, and their production processes remain excessively polluting in the absence of proper regulation or pricing mechanisms.
Regulatory Interventions
To address negative externalities, government interventions often prove necessary. Such interventions can include direct regulations, bans, taxes, or the establishment of permit markets. For example, smoking bans reduce public exposure to secondhand smoke, and mandatory car insurance aims to mitigate the negative externalities of uninsured driving. Environmental regulations can impose strict limits on waste disposal, allowable emissions of specific chemicals, or the chemical composition of consumer products. Permit markets, which assign a defined pollution quota, allow entities to bid for the right to pollute, thereby providing financial incentives to curb harmful emissions.
Pigouvian Taxes and Internalizing Externalities
The British economist Arthur Cecil Pigou proposed that governments tax producers in proportion to the harm their production inflicts on third parties. Such “Pigouvian taxes“ aim to internalize externalities, effectively restoring market efficiency by ensuring that all costs of a transaction, including environmental harm, are borne by the responsible parties. A prime example is a carbon tax, which incorporates the societal costs of CO2 emissions into the price of carbon-intensive products, thus encouraging businesses and consumers to reduce emissions or switch to cleaner alternatives.
Pigou's logic also applies to positive externalities. Government subsidies can be used to lower the costs of providing or accessing beneficial services, such as education, healthcare, or energy efficiency improvements, to enhance overall societal welfare.
Read Our Other Insights
March 15, 2024
How Environmental Impact Accounting Is Reshaping Corporate Decision-Making
The landscape of corporate financial decision-making is undergoing a fundamental transformation. As environmental data becomes increasingly material to business operations, companies are grappling with a critical challenge: how to effectively measure, monetize, and act upon their environmental impact.
March 5, 2024
How Prepared Are Companies for Rising Carbon Costs?
Carbon pricing has been described as 'the most important number you've never heard of'. The metric is meant to capture the harm caused by a ton of carbon emissions, making it a foundation of national climate change policy.